| Re: [hatari-devel] New drive image settings |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] New drive image settings
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:50:32 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1539150633; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=feUFWMaGnEsWx2hpYJz5wmLwLUEGu66jGRInnljvBWs=; b=bceaAzRdI4Y7ccz4in1PMcJN5NtBd+Yo5yr58FaFQYpKfqfXo3c1wy+eQYpAiwlNUi OB6rMNU7sIZe3QWlBEv8TwyVqXBxUAtqNiPpq+Czi2nKoqU6ZEFz9XiZUnOHtKGNbTGz P9Kj0+OR+RQPS9BQ3hnHO0h3RR/J+SjCMGL7vJjFW5s1oIArsNb07O7SyxauTYSLM2r5 PY49y2yIfAqhe3ucvHt2LRl2jfnNCG/y+aSAc0+LQMF05o+Tuusce7fTT7obD4WWazbn /l+m7/kklNnjFkJzUiORmWwtGgC4lQ/WNmXQ/pp9mQwfm7gsdIzQNSwnOu7837sXt4rk kizA==
Hi,
> Yes, maybe ... but does it really matter? It's just a string...
> (actually I wonder whether the ID should be encoder there at all, since
> you would not expect a change of the string just because it is
> connected to a different port of the bus)
I agree, it's better to not code the ID in the device name. Actually, if
there is a tool that for some reason remembers the device name (I think
GEMAR even does this in its config files, but I'm not sure), changing the
name will cause a problem.
> I've played with the settings there a little bit (you've mentioned 16
> bytes, not 1 byte), but it did not help. So currently this is not
> emulated yet, since I did not find the right setting yet. If you want
> to have a try, have a look at the dma_check() function in ncr5380.c.
Can you provide a drive image I can reproduce this problem with?
Best regards
Uwe