| Re: [hatari-devel] The IPF license |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
----- Thomas Huth wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (MST)
> schrieb David Savinkoff <dsavnkff@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm concerned about Debian, Fedora and other distro policies.
>
> Hi David,
>
> I see your point, but you missed one detail (I should maybe
> explicitely have mentioned that in my mail, sorry for the confusion):
> Linking against the IPF library is completely optional. If you do not
> have the IPF library installed on your system, you can continue to
> build an Hatari binary without any exemptions. So Linux distros will
> just continue to build Hatari as they did before, their binary just
> won't have IPF support.
> Does that sound ok for you now? Or do your concerns persist?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
Hi,
I've read the comments this far and give my support for IPF.
I also read part of this FAQ:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FSWithNFLibs
Sincerely,
David Savinkoff