Re: [hatari-devel] The IPF license

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

----- Thomas Huth wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:01:32 -0700 (MST)
> schrieb David Savinkoff <dsavnkff@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm concerned about Debian, Fedora and other distro policies.
>  Hi David,
> I see your point, but you missed one detail (I should maybe
> explicitely have mentioned that in my mail, sorry for the confusion):
> Linking against the IPF library is completely optional. If you do not
> have the IPF library installed on your system, you can continue to
> build an Hatari binary without any exemptions. So Linux distros will
> just continue to build Hatari as they did before, their binary just
> won't have IPF support.
> Does that sound ok for you now? Or do your concerns persist?
>  Regards,
>   Thomas

I've read the comments this far and give my support for IPF.

I also read part of this FAQ:

David Savinkoff

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+