Re: [hatari-devel] Possible 1.7 regression

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/06/2013 20:58, Troed Sångberg wrote:
> Followup:
>
> I knew I recognized a few of the numbers as well as the content and it's
> been bugging me since I sent the previous email. The content loaded at
> offset 1024 is the same as in the .ST floppy image at offset 512 and
> 3072. It's the FAT, right? ;)
>
> If so I guess a good description of the problem would be that when my
> program uses gem bdos file access after having been executed from AUTO
> the F_READ will have the first 10*256 bytes replaced with the first
> track (although, with the 512 -> 1024 offset difference so there's
> something else to it). The rest of the loaded content is fine.
>
> Without having looked at the Hatari source it almost sounds like
> leftover debug code.
>
> /Troed

Hello

this looks really strange to me, I don't remember any debug code that 
would do this, nor any special behaviour in Hatari depending on the use 
of the AUTO folder or not on a floppy.

Assuming you don't want to spread your program for now, can you make a 
stripped down version that only does the file access and see if it still 
fails from the auto/ folder ?

It would be much easier to track if we could run the program ourselves.

Nicolas