[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Owls
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:05:01 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=b6iPTcASlyr47qCfji3A62aaO6kN4V2bxFYV4AzCYKQ=; b=bAY2Mja7EyHUTLbF5odOF76/gOsKu8tceBYEeqkRtOXqowxAa+9diXbvZpVFntoRlb /XwISle2+cRF6KWJUJI0t11F81BWFRXNVnBq5pnYgVw3p5iutUllrNo+v3USWtGBdPTk nwUWmh2ZsVQ3dbhsYZ1BzODoyd4ml6xlkdTSI=
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, I see what you mean. I think that the image itself (the owl
> itself) should remain free of any text: I don't know many mascots that
> have text on them. But I agree with the need for a second logo with
> the mascot on the side (still text-free) and the name 'Eigen', styled,
> next to it.
ok for that. I guess that for you that eliminates all the variants
with the 'e' inside the owl, and also the ones with diag([e i g e n]),
but there are many others. Any opinion on them?
So far, I've got a negative feedback on the versions with the owl
whose hat looks too academic, and a positive one on "e[i]gen" and
simply "[i]" for the squared version - I'm just sharing some feedback
I received.
gael