| Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:40:30 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6t4EGoXqOrXrXHamA/U1Moe7PTKF+xRFW2BlSPHT22Q=; b=tG1wA3Nh7xVRk6EoYkouuY5IYqimeMNi000d9KDcfJEzA1+WCBWgqLmr92DOVJpfPh KM+SQ+qqYx40PeRSBnKb8EwWMC4WjFKDoRvhpexR1muFGj0e4f7BfnBDlNCH3mRSHd5c nHMZ4Jycc+WOtFFs6NQm866AYZQoE0VDkxC0I=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wZx1OyR/DhBUVfOwJTlGA3wFxa6AN5FPFBMhsFBDKFLJ2r5GoVtTbPyUaeks1GnhqH /Zm0vGvNYvNHjJz7r+Ncjhy1okN7d7EkYsCl/Bnrz9D5+2NehsnDLem4clnPUMQj21qK hSDuyI7fu97p8BPcy6sRvsv/YgVZXWZnCFopg=
I just am very stubborn and abuse the situation to get people to spend
time explaining me stuff :-)
Benoit
2010/7/19 Aron Ahmadia <aja2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I agree, it's a separate function that doesn't modify any of your
> existing API. Thanks to Jitse and Helmut for their input, I wasn't
> doing a very good job on my own of defending the noble condition
> number :)
>
> A
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jitse Niesen <jitse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>>
>>> I see. Sounds reasonable! Do I understand correctly that it would be OK to
>>> add [condition number] as a new, separate method in existing decomposition
>>> classes, i.e. that it would not require changing any existing API?
>>
>> Yes, that's correct, at least as far as I understand it.
>>
>>
>> Jitse
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>