Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0 |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0*From*: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:40:30 -0400*Dkim-signature*: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6t4EGoXqOrXrXHamA/U1Moe7PTKF+xRFW2BlSPHT22Q=; b=tG1wA3Nh7xVRk6EoYkouuY5IYqimeMNi000d9KDcfJEzA1+WCBWgqLmr92DOVJpfPh KM+SQ+qqYx40PeRSBnKb8EwWMC4WjFKDoRvhpexR1muFGj0e4f7BfnBDlNCH3mRSHd5c nHMZ4Jycc+WOtFFs6NQm866AYZQoE0VDkxC0I=*Domainkey-signature*: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wZx1OyR/DhBUVfOwJTlGA3wFxa6AN5FPFBMhsFBDKFLJ2r5GoVtTbPyUaeks1GnhqH /Zm0vGvNYvNHjJz7r+Ncjhy1okN7d7EkYsCl/Bnrz9D5+2NehsnDLem4clnPUMQj21qK hSDuyI7fu97p8BPcy6sRvsv/YgVZXWZnCFopg=

I just am very stubborn and abuse the situation to get people to spend time explaining me stuff :-) Benoit 2010/7/19 Aron Ahmadia <aja2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I agree, it's a separate function that doesn't modify any of your > existing API. Thanks to Jitse and Helmut for their input, I wasn't > doing a very good job on my own of defending the noble condition > number :) > > A > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jitse Niesen <jitse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Benoit Jacob wrote: >> >>> I see. Sounds reasonable! Do I understand correctly that it would be OK to >>> add [condition number] as a new, separate method in existing decomposition >>> classes, i.e. that it would not require changing any existing API? >> >> Yes, that's correct, at least as far as I understand it. >> >> >> Jitse >> >> >> > > >

**References**:**[eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Robert Lupton the Good

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Christoph Hertzberg

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Robert Lupton the Good

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] Proposal: Matrices requiring compact storage of triangular part** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |