| Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0
- From: Aron Ahmadia <aja2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:13:09 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Ob1PS9nwEXUriVFWU5173ro51K7CnbZuLIAAlTkDp7w=; b=T6f58pkb6MW1GPlNyp4h8y/trz+38zxWnWUMSnSBm2iFD1saa/GFImZdJ4olU06Run ryHvvJOepZEKDcvMji84l1mtRGpiXoKQTHyyEjhhWW3njcrW4079PYoNZLIA1IRskhWi PNafOpka1S3oBl1Suv6sKeiiOvJPk5nUw/FSM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VA2pONPfcjAEY573VLlp/HDb0hNP3i/m0dt59z6qlc7dIxfk3zwnN0aSiCZl/Rt53u ynaGbJkNzFLRPrxv1hee8M55hJx6TqNsF/jYeB393xvbab4Kw9gLn/Zlbhkqe4QyA2/h C5X7HRSIgbetN6xyQddOr8/LG3yIb+3+cJBrY=
I agree, it's a separate function that doesn't modify any of your
existing API. Thanks to Jitse and Helmut for their input, I wasn't
doing a very good job on my own of defending the noble condition
number :)
A
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jitse Niesen <jitse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>
>> I see. Sounds reasonable! Do I understand correctly that it would be OK to
>> add [condition number] as a new, separate method in existing decomposition
>> classes, i.e. that it would not require changing any existing API?
>
> Yes, that's correct, at least as far as I understand it.
>
>
> Jitse
>
>
>