Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0 |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0*From*: Aron Ahmadia <aja2111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:13:09 +0300*Dkim-signature*: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Ob1PS9nwEXUriVFWU5173ro51K7CnbZuLIAAlTkDp7w=; b=T6f58pkb6MW1GPlNyp4h8y/trz+38zxWnWUMSnSBm2iFD1saa/GFImZdJ4olU06Run ryHvvJOepZEKDcvMji84l1mtRGpiXoKQTHyyEjhhWW3njcrW4079PYoNZLIA1IRskhWi PNafOpka1S3oBl1Suv6sKeiiOvJPk5nUw/FSM=*Domainkey-signature*: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VA2pONPfcjAEY573VLlp/HDb0hNP3i/m0dt59z6qlc7dIxfk3zwnN0aSiCZl/Rt53u ynaGbJkNzFLRPrxv1hee8M55hJx6TqNsF/jYeB393xvbab4Kw9gLn/Zlbhkqe4QyA2/h C5X7HRSIgbetN6xyQddOr8/LG3yIb+3+cJBrY=

I agree, it's a separate function that doesn't modify any of your existing API. Thanks to Jitse and Helmut for their input, I wasn't doing a very good job on my own of defending the noble condition number :) A On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jitse Niesen <jitse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Benoit Jacob wrote: > >> I see. Sounds reasonable! Do I understand correctly that it would be OK to >> add [condition number] as a new, separate method in existing decomposition >> classes, i.e. that it would not require changing any existing API? > > Yes, that's correct, at least as far as I understand it. > > > Jitse > > >

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**References**:**[eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Robert Lupton the Good

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Christoph Hertzberg

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Robert Lupton the Good

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Aron Ahmadia

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0***From:*Jitse Niesen

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Problem inverting a Matrix4f with Eigen 2.0.0**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |