|Re: [eigen] build system changes|
[ Thread Index |
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] build system changes
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:38:47 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x+K9HhV6kCbkMUDDOSItkKCR6LHcQWONHQgTM+csBz8=; b=bU4LyZAlhnFM0u4XWhkzpx4lGqfFohMGLq8HK2qCeUUDk06OYMv9j8qmd8wauQmYTw gMazTj6RsP2/8Yf50iWJT9kBQpVb2HaqQ0sVnB5KIpcT9IylQHibT9ky058uVjDW68qH 4IM9UzF02ibW82+gSkNjfjw3b0Z+c1zEwr914=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OT88JvpKmjLV/71PPcb7GTC6egg+CFjyhN7vwSyYKoXbOeKTZn1M37/REX5OQPY+Q6 +odXsu0IZiysDeDqyRUApTmRcdJYb4ntKn++530w+3+DE+Hv3hVZDIdlvJu2V9iZy1A5 VYaneWIJFJIzJgcMXOMEJTh9anD9OgZAfJgP4=
2009/11/11 Thomas Capricelli <orzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> In data mercoledì 11 novembre 2009 14:57:47, Benoit Jacob ha scritto:
>> But don't you use make-based platforms like e.g. linux?
>> See the bottom of the root CMakeLists.txt.
>> I'm interested to know why you didn't see it, as you're probably not
>> the only one.
> Yes, indeed, it's written by cmake, but i hadn't noticed (it's not a real
> problem : i haven't needed debug_* so far)
> (and yes, i use linux+make, of course :)
> When you do 'make', nothing happen, do you know how to make your 'make menu'
> appears in this case ? It's a common practice. This way we would have the menu
> not only at cmake time, but when we're kinda lost. Sadly I dont know how to do
> that with cmake.
ah, that could be done by adding a custom target that runs a script
that prints the message, and then making other targets depend on that
but i'm not really sure. First, since the debug_xxx is going away,
there's no need anymore to document that. Then, i'm afraid of the
clutter if we print that message both in cmake and then in make. The
more interesting question is rather how to make it more visible where
it currently is. Should I skip a few lines and/or print a line of
> Thomas Capricelli <orzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>