Re: [eigen] build system changes |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] build system changes
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:57:47 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2n2dYbCgZ3GRxrZVlWtswba3NBw+zwR2NG4sl/cTTIg=; b=D4hfH3ReGJ+sbFv/DGZyJT4T3+kEnPyivM8r+wJKbqrf83X7NtZwNmgYtz5bkYtEzy q50yvxDBJ+p2Z7+RXd9qpxb3gaQ/Dzd/6k7zkHxf+MIDxdPH96js6J5raKGdnm5pWMrf h/GizUyCs5PSpSICs6ZNVz0VI7kG3THxQxnCk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x/QCvkxf2dUUUTfrhUfBCRIssrQwNAEa/Cu19B2hkXwJlovCdwDgeX/mHIDNmPi1nC jLVjfjhGpd2RlrYtgHJ4FSb4c3ITTOy+LiZRFF0o1TVe7Q4gmPaaHO/QfIrvtRB+dare ykOIKkzFAoXuGq/FPOOiLCqceqRsNRmvX8Gjc=
2009/11/10 Thomas Capricelli <orzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> In data mercoledì 11 novembre 2009 02:34:32, Benoit Jacob ha scritto:
>> The only reason for test_xxx vs debug_xxx was that passing
>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=XXX was cumbersome. Instead, what we can do is
>> generate in the build directory 2 tiny scripts ./debug and ./release
>> setting the corresponding build type.
>
> I'm ok with anything as far as there's a minimum of documentation about how to
> compile/run the test, and how to write a test!
> I guess most of people will agree :-)
Documentation about compile/run was given in the cmake output on
make-based platforms, and on the Developer's Corner page, but indeed
one can put more doc on the wiki.
Documentation about how to write a test was on Developers Corner wiki
page, indeed it needs an update.
>
> I did not know about debug_* in fact.. I've looked in my test/, and there are
> only test_*. The rules for debug_* are in the makefile but i was not aware of
> them.
But don't you use make-based platforms like e.g. linux?
See the bottom of the root CMakeLists.txt.
I'm interested to know why you didn't see it, as you're probably not
the only one.
Benoit