Re: [eigen] still the solve() API debate

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, it's probably a good idea to enable using c++0x features
automatically [...] 
This would go into Core/util/Macros.h.

I did that now. I also adapted the StaticAssert header accordingly such that it will detect VC10. Maybe all those tests should be done in the Macros header or even in a separate header - similar to what boost does for each compiler. Otherwise we will start writing redundant checks for e.g. C++0x features.

I was considering that not having a configured header was a feature,
not a lack.

After thinking a bit about it I totally agree - why would you want somebody to force to use CMake for a header only lib.

- Hauke

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+