Re: [AD] Display options that aren't really options

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On June 9, 2010, Milan Mimica wrote:
> On 9 June 2010 02:39, Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I wasn't aware that that would make a real difference to the hardware.
> > Max texture size is max texture size is it not?
> 
> No one can say for sure. There is also OpenGL3+ which could
> expose/hide some features...
> 
> Maybe we should allow requesting minimum bitmap size with:
> al_set_new_display_option(ALLEGRO_MAX_BITMAP_SIZE, <value>,
> ALLEGRO_REQUIRED) Then al_create_display() could give you D3D, OpenGL or
> some third driver if you don't specify a flag. That would be neat. It's
> same for some other options. After all, users should not care which
> driver is being used as long as they get all the required features.
> 
> > Still aren't options regardless.
> 
> I agree. But that's just a little inconsistency.

I thought the point of the new api was to get rid of all the little 
inconsistencies?

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/