Re: [AD] Audio addon API / Re: Renaming of functions in kcm_audio addon

[Peter Wang <novalazy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2008-12-02, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2008, at 06:51, Peter Wang wrote:
> > Recycling is definitely the better approach.  It's almost as if
> > al_set_sample_data() was added for this purpose and I forgot about it.
> > Patch attached.
> 
> Neat!
> My only real comment (at the moment) is that I'd prefer "simple" to  
> "easy" in this context. Who in their right mind would use a  
> "complicated" API if there's also an "easy" one? On the other hand, I  
> can think of various reasons to use a more "sophisticated" API in  
> favour of a "simple" one. This is a point of personal preference, of  
> course. :)
> Oh, and there's a goto in the example that comes with it. ;)

Committed so you can improve as you see fit.

Peter