| Re: [AD] Audio addon API / Re: Renaming of functions in kcm_audio addon |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: Coordination of admins/developers of the game programming library Allegro <alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [AD] Audio addon API / Re: Renaming of functions in kcm_audio addon
- From: Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 09:17:45 -0500
On 2 Dec 2008, at 06:51, Peter Wang wrote:
Recycling is definitely the better approach. It's almost as if
al_set_sample_data() was added for this purpose and I forgot about it.
Patch attached.
Neat!
My only real comment (at the moment) is that I'd prefer "simple" to
"easy" in this context. Who in their right mind would use a
"complicated" API if there's also an "easy" one? On the other hand, I
can think of various reasons to use a more "sophisticated" API in
favour of a "simple" one. This is a point of personal preference, of
course. :)
Oh, and there's a goto in the example that comes with it. ;)
Evert