Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
From: Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:04:04 +0100

On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 08:53 +1100, Peter Wang wrote:
> 
> The syntax would be @libdir@ if you were wanting configure to make the
> substitution.
> 

Inside configure.in?

My idea was, to get an entry:

#define ALLEGRO_MODULES_PATH "/usr/local/lib/allegro"

into alunixac.h. Or should we rather use a -D compiler switch?

-- 
Elias Pschernig

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Peter Wang

References:
- [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Evert Glebbeek
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Hans de Goede
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Hans de Goede
- Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
  - From: Peter Wang

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Re: Build Errors on Mac OSX (x86)
Next by Date: [AD] PATCH: updated mprotect patch for allegro-4.2.1 which also work on Linux
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x
Next by thread: Re: [AD] binary compatibility check for 4.2.x

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/