Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO

Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
From: Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:53:41 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P5/mjOotu3H+uixwaf7/dNDrgfQrfyY9/2WVPdqC6ihOT0fV7GiNMMKbDcu1U1xk/jk7Vyz0ws8MgbcNnRaGGP92DpC5LBOajM/L2DCih3arOjQsRnos4YBsMzlt5LEpDQDr9bIuSUkTR4udwcNnuPFRY6clJjbLsV9JLcuNJvg=

Siarhei Siamashka wrote:


As for ASM vs. C, assembly optimized version of clear_to_color() is
faster than its C counterpart, on the other hand C-implementation of RLE
sprites is faster than ASM.

I wonder if it is possible to easily exclude ASM in some functions andleave it in the others.



--
Milan Mimica
http://sparklet.sf.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Siarhei Siamashka

References:
- [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Peter Hull
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Milan Mimica
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Kalle Last
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Siarhei Siamashka

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
Next by Date: [AD] truecolor fonts
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
Next by thread: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/