[AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM

[AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
From: Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:33:43 +0100

There was some short talk about this in #allgro earlier today about it -
does anyone know the details why we have both? If not, I'll try
investigating, and either clarify or merge them.

-- 
Elias Pschernig

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
  - From: Peter Hull

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] Re: Build Errors on Mac OSX (x86)
Next by Date: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] getpixel() documentation
Next by thread: Re: [AD] ALLEGRO_USE_C vs ALLEGRO_NO_ASM

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/