Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On 2005-11-12, Evert Glebbeek <eglebbk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It should have never been made, as people unwilling to download MinGW
> > should just have to use a binary package. As it is now, the "dll"
> > package is not maintained nor will it probably ever be again. I'd just
> > hide it from the main page if possible.
> 
> Makes sense, I'll do that.

Maybe someone will need to get a hold of the 4.0.3 DLL?

And how come some of the betas and RCs are hidden?  I actually might be
responsible for hiding some of the 4.0.x ones, but at the moment I don't
see any reason they should not be available.

Peter





Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/