| Re: [AD] Allegro 4.2.0 RC2 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:59 +0200, Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:
> I carefully tried to avoid the backport word. Just applying the
> vital patches to make it compile out of the box would be enough. The
> point is, new users will be scared of using something labelled
> unstable branch. And now with 4.2.0 near, are we going to maintain
> two stable branches and the WIP one?
>
Can't we mark 4.0.x as arcane? Everything you can do with it you can do
with 4.2.x, and it also is 100% compatible (well, there may be
adjustements necessary in certain programs doing things like accessing
internals or abusing unspecified behavior, but still). So, I don't see
any reason to maintain it any longer.
--
Elias Pschernig