Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
From: Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:54:31 +0200

Elias Pschernig wrote:

But maybe /I only works with "", not with <>?


/I work for both

--
Regards,
    Michal

References:
- RE: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Robert Ohannessian
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Michal Molhanec
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Elias Pschernig

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] GIF patent / support
Next by Date: Re: [AD] GIF patent / support
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Next by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/