Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
From: Dustin Dettmer <dustin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT)

Elias Pschernig wrote:
> > But maybe /I only works with "", not with <>?

As I always understood it, <> was used for including
external libraries / files and "" for internal files. 
The example files are technicaly not in the library,
but they're so close that "" are used instead of <>.

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] grabber ._txification
Next by Date: Re: [AD] GIF patent / support
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Next by thread: [AD] 4.1.16 WIP changes

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/