Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Elias Pschernig wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 13:50:07 -0700, Robert Ohannessian
> <rohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I think the reason was that the examples get built before Allegro is
> > installed, so the compiler may not find allegro.h if you use <>.
> Yes. But directories specified with -I are searched first. (I suspect
> this may have changed at some version of gcc. Or maybe other compilers
> like MSVC have no equicalent of -I, and therefore need "" instead of
> <>?)

1) every compiler has equivalent of -I. MSVC has, for example, /I :-)

1) i'm repeating myself little bit, but: using "" instead of <> makes 
_absolutely_ _no_ _difference_ in this case because the header files are 
not in the examples directory. unless i'm missing anything here there is 
no way how can "" help compiler to find allegro.h. you still have to use -I

--
Regards,
    Michal