Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
From: Elias Pschernig <allefant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 21:16:11 +0200

But maybe /I only works with "", not with <>? If there's really no
reason for "", I'd like to change it to <> - just so nobody can be
confused by it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Michal Molhanec

References:
- RE: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Robert Ohannessian
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Elias Pschernig
- Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
  - From: Michal Molhanec

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Mouse cusor documentation
Next by Date: Re: [AD] GIF patent / support
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples
Next by thread: Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/