Re: [AD] #include <allegro.h> vs #include "allegro.h" in the examples

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 13:50:07 -0700, Robert Ohannessian
<rohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the reason was that the examples get built before Allegro is
> installed, so the compiler may not find allegro.h if you use <>.
> 

Yes. But directories specified with -I are searched first. (I suspect
this may have changed at some version of gcc. Or maybe other compilers
like MSVC have no equicalent of -I, and therefore need "" instead of
<>?)




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/