| Re: [frogs] chord_name_engraver - help with c++ ... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] chord_name_engraver - help with c++ ...
- From: Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulliego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:22:36 +0200
- Cc: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gk/Lb1sk+ShGvuzYiVBoPrkmmTvzNBz9FPM9cscQBxM=; b=AF1GOUesK494iDN5xbrrOZs8J4dO3TjqEVSRiyuWgI0/uPV6Odh3LvEPtixXUdE8Sr YRlS8mtHEtjygrRYfzLdoL+PWPYxsdtduZ48Nem8uCn+XRhIPj1OHMmVM7bCqeyv+ETB T1KehpT2xnpJ4VMmVqtgZSX5bwBx3akQJ0jB4=
2011/7/6 Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Fixes made. I'm happy with it now, it appears to work fine :-)
Do parentheses look good? I remember that they were sort of weird...
> I presume I need to document it now, sort out a regression test, etc?
Both a regression test and an entry in the docs (probably in NR 2.7.2
-> Printing chord names) should be done.
> The only problem I'm having at the moment is with make-pitch - I want to
> document a sharp or flat, and it wants to take an integer as the third
> argument. Experiment isn't being that helpful at finding what that third
> argument should be (-1 is returning either a double-flat or half-flat,
> not sure which). The docu says "alter is a rational number of 200-cent
> whole tones",
since 1 semitone = 100 cents, i'd try 0.5 as the third argument.
thanks,
Janek
PS do you use git from command line or via lily-git?
---
----
Join the Frogs!