| Re: [frogs] chord_name_engraver - help with c++ ... |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] chord_name_engraver - help with c++ ...
- From: Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulliego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:29:15 +0200
- Cc: Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7IVcLQpD/osAIDCkFZBqyc1dhRoNR5Po3mfLWHU2sd0=; b=JL9SQscE2WoFanU4qTURVt+9TS7CgMHa78+7/yAqBqlsjk8Bc+jiXJG+TebebE/s0x zuP64J407Fe/9kChk5qsT4yShoq4XkE/zqXuQ3SWzG2G9ecyQiM4F/ljLqvJpEgJ3OFW mp+dp5bYpCAa/svG1UhYyLxdYEUeKfsJo/dw4=
2011/7/5 Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> This frog is back ... I said I'd wait until 2.14 which has finally
> arrived :-) But I've revamped my code a bit and am having problems...
Could you send me a link to the previous discussion on this topic? A
quick search didn't return anything.
2011/7/5 Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>:
>> Next step - that code compiles okay. But it doesn't work when run ...
>>
>> I'm getting the following errors:
>>
>> Interpreting music...
>> warning: cannot find property type-check for `capoVertical'
>> (translation-type?). perhaps a typing error?
>> warning: doing assignment anyway
>> warning: cannot find property type-check for `capoPitch'
>> (translation-type?). perhaps a typing error?
>> warning: doing assignment anyway
>>
>> But I've added capoVertical and capoPitch to the ADD_TRANSLATOR section,
>> and I've added them to define-context-properties.scm. So why can't it
>> find it? Or is it that I've installed 2.15 locally, and it's finding the
>> scheme code for 2.14 or 2.12? Unlikely, I would have thought, wouldn't
>> that cause a crash?
>
> Actually, it's not likely that the scheme code would cause a crash.
>
> If I were wanting to check this out, I'd put a Scheme display statement at
> the top of scm/context-properties.scm.
Interesting. IIRC i had similar problems with my ambitus patch. I'll
look at this when i return to it.
> If you could post a patch set on Rietveld, we might be able to give you
> better advice.
If you have any problem with Rietveld, i'll gladly help you; I can
upload your patch if you want.
cheers,
Janek
---
----
Join the Frogs!