[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
Brenton I agree, but not with the idea, that everybody should make his
own fork - thats a total wast of time and energy!!!
Lets try to clear things:
one questions to panksos server - is there anybody, who has root
access? - I could bite myself in the butt, because pankso offered me
root access and I just said later, because I had absolute no time.
when I look the mails of the last months, I see a very interesting offer
from Martin, who owns www.slitaz.eu:
"If you need a dedicated host for an alternative clone of server content
let me know
ill be happy to set it up for the slitaz community here i got a 100Mbit
fiber connection
and a server up and running.
Sincerally
Martin "Ztealmax" Svensson"
That does not sound bad? - Martin - would you have space, if all devs
agree, to host a new tank server? Perhaps is just good to leaf the tank
of pankso just how it is now?
Christopher has an own wok-tank cooking branch with kernel 3.? (if I
remember well) http://godane.wordpress.com/ - somebody else something
simalar?
would this be an accepable start for the new release?
I hope I do not step on somebodys legs, I am no dev, I am just a user,
who thinks SliTaz should continue and we need a working new release
I think, it is time to make decisions
Thomas
Am Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:45:01 +0200
schrieb Brenton Edgar Scott <trixarian@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Whatever the reasoning, we have to make a choice.
>
> I have a general reasoning about things like this. If something
> doesn't work the way I want, I generally try to fix it so it does.
> Then I share my 'fixes'. That's how my packages and the majority of
> my other projects came into existence. Bemoaning how your packages
> are being ignored doesn't help the matter. Do what I or Christopher
> did and make your own site for them.
>
> Also remember that the new Unity or Gnome Shell Ubuntu uses is only
> available in Ubuntu. Other distros still provide pure GNOME instead of
> this alternative.
>
> Another factor we have to consider is that with the latest kernel we
> instantly lose support for older hardware because support for it got
> stripped from the kernel. This is a fact of Linux.
>
> But let's decide now. It's clear that 'life happened' to pankso and I
> don't believe we should begrudge him this. What we should do is try to
> preserve his creation, even if we have to put in place the missing
> pieces ourselves. He can correct things he doesn't like later, but for
> now, it's just us and we need to push this or SliTaz will suffer the
> same fate as Damn Small Linux, although not for the same reasons.
>
> Anyway, that's my 10 cents worth.
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/