[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
Developement is one side, but security is the other side and for me it
is more important in this moment.
Slitaz is a distribution that is used by many people around the world
and I definitly would like to know, where the server is now located,
who has root access .... I just want to remember you, that Linux
Foundation servers were hacked in September.....
Christophe, I think it is really time to give some explanation - if you
cant on the mailinglist, so do it straight to christopher or pascal.
Thomas
Am Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:08:09 -0200
schrieb Rodrigo Boechat <rodrigo.boechat.tenorio@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Maybe you're right. But say something like this through a mailing
> list, it's kind of inappropriate. I am enthusiastic about SliTaz.
> SliTaz actually revived an old machine of mine.
>
> I'm not part of the developer team, but I think many people missed
> this year with ethics.
> Every community needs a leader. If you do not share ideas or their
> ideas had not heard properly, took some kind of attitude change that?
> Or was saved and stored as a "hurt"?
>
> I do not know why. I even wish I could use gnome 2 with SliTaz, but a
> lot could have happened for you to be left out. But one way or
> another, talk something like this, it is also contrary to the meaning
> of community. For as I know, the community around the SliTaz not
> necessarily have to comply with your ideas. Or do they have?
>
> Know that I do not want to attack anyone. Just decided to expose my
> thoughts. A view looking out of the "black box".
>
> Rodrigo Boechat
>
> Em 07-11-2011 20:16, Daniele Guerrieri escreveu:
> > The ideas of slitaz were good, but now everything it's getting too
> > much older, including kernel upgrades.
> > Why doesn't some of you brings further this project? I made some
> > packages to add gnome 2 support but sadly i saw that nobody put
> > them upstream. Why? on my system i could start gnome 2.32, but my
> > packages were discarded.
> > A community project should not rely on a single person; everyone
> > should and could contribute.
> > I think that linux users who aren't satisfied with the new
> > gnome-shell and unity will neither appreciate an old and buggy
> > system like Slitaz. For me, Slitaz is no more useful
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, guilbault frederic
> > <fredericguilbault@xxxxxxx <mailto:fredericguilbault@xxxxxxx>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I found this funny. Theres no big dilema to me.
> >
> > Last time i have talk with pankso. it was when tazwok have been
> > replace due to the risk for Slitaz of beeing unmaintable if the
> > mains devlopers woud gone. Now Pankso seem to be absent and the
> > devlopement/maintining compromise ....
> >
> > what pankso woud do ?
> >
> > xfred.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:11:20 +0000
> > Subject: Where is pankso?
> > From: slaxemulator@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:slaxemulator@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: pascal.bellard@xxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:pascal.bellard@xxxxxxxxxx>; slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; pankso@xxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:pankso@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Where is pankso? I ask this cause we need to move forward and
> > with him not even on scm.slitaz.org <http://scm.slitaz.org> for
> > like 6 weeks its starting to make me worry about him and slitaz. We
> > need to start updating stuff again cause everything is so broken
> > that if we stable it will be another joke again.
> >
> > Chroot needs to be automaticly updated after new packages are
> > build so it can stay up to date without much work. This way wok
> > can still be update and chroot will update itself after package
> > build. I myself have done alot of changes to cookutils in
> > my-cookutils <https://bitbucket.org/godane/my-cookutils> repo. I
> > would like to be able add them in myself but pankso doesn't want
> > me touch cookutils cause he thinks i will make it unworkable
> > like tazwok for him. So i think we could work it out by simple
> > allowing my just work in a testing branch until there is a time you
> > think a merge should be done. There is also a new graft
> > <http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#graft> option in
> > mercurial 2.0 that will allow cherry-picks stuff from my testing
> > branch to default branch so it will be easier to merge things
> > that way.
> >
> > Anyway we need to move froward with or without pankso.
> >
> >
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/