Re: Content negociation on SliTaz Network

[Claudinei Pereira <contato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

>> Is this site based on a wiki?
> No, it is static xHTML files because it doesn't move so much.

I'm translating and updating the website and docs for almost 3 years
to SliTaz, and I prefer editing static files than the wiki approach.
It's just a **personal preference**. Of course I understand that's
possible to make things easier for contributors to contribute, but
keep in mind that manage another one CMS costs a bit more than static
files management (security updates, cms code tweaking, put more load
on the server [and on Pankso], etc).

2011/5/7 Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Scratch that comment about the Stupid -- I was thinking only about the
> acronym, not myself or any of the other contributors....  Certainly
> the passion we all seem to have for Slitaz bespeaks a high amount of
> intelligence.  (-:
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I agree that a wiki is the way to go.  There are numerous little
>> errors that would be easily fixed by the community at large, but you
>> can't expect someone to ask for access to the repos, sync with the
>> right folder and push their changes when all they might want to do is
>> correct the grammar of one sentence.
>>
>> That being said, I never did edit the tazpanel README like I promised.
>>  I've questioned my lack of motivation for this and I realize I was
>> offended when you said you wouldn't let Slitaz be run by "a bunch of
>> crazy people on IRC".  (And it needs more than just a few corrections.
>>  I had planned on doing a rewrite, separating basic usage information
>> from developer stuff.  While I'm not a programmer, not a developer, I
>> am a damn good writer.)  We crazy people have contributed a lot of
>> hours working for the good of the project -- without any real
>> direction from the lead developers, only complaints when things don't
>> turn out the way you think they should.
>>
>> With that in mind, consider the analogy of building a house being like
>> the production of a linux distro.  While the architect may also do
>> some of the construction, there is no rationale for criticizing the
>> designs of any worker, if there is no blueprint to follow.  KISS is
>> not good enough direction.  And it should be Simple (even for the
>> Stupid) to offer what they may, even if it's just language skills and
>> a few minor edits.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ikem Krueger
>> <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 2011/5/7, Ikem Krueger <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>>> A wiki would be a lot easier
>>>
>>>> 2011/5/7, Dominique Corbex <dominique.corbex@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>> It would be a lot easier for you, but it's a pain for the admins
>>>
>>> If you want me to help you, make it as easy as possible for me to help you.
>>>
>>> --
>>> LXDE is looking for a new maintainer of LXPanel. So if you are a developer,
>>> get in contact with us. :)
>>>
>>> ---
>>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>



-- 
www.claudineipereira.com

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/