| Re: Content negociation on SliTaz Network |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Content negociation on SliTaz Network
- From: Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 17:03:27 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pPDti+b8mHmYMGNcadANwr4q4ngWeJDg7Ei03O/yeqs=; b=kxssekSxr1kCu0iGyCstthJc4HoUgX+iVHPPioDQXrs37CSIwiStRPNfSyluvCwfdi VUtCxx7AZg2vo7EAvf50iA41gQuVVfbIgmFsgSOhUANeUUXXjlu4p+QhsmacXcHMOpDF 3hc+uENQvVgBUb2pnncgRV+u+9R7Zpuo9TJAI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IS45BICoGQOeGHLLjgKFrP2+5jN3ZOGOLMH6W3rWgh0fZn6FVCml1H1iVmiFHKVQCh oS7TMB8OsOHXOpDZkzpF8h0kGS721sAiyZ4uwyW0zXohFIOGULlre0FOGrDobg4Pg304 6q3sErq8K9XLmBZXzpM8BPTaW1+LD2TmU7WNo=
Scratch that comment about the Stupid -- I was thinking only about the
acronym, not myself or any of the other contributors.... Certainly
the passion we all seem to have for Slitaz bespeaks a high amount of
intelligence. (-:
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that a wiki is the way to go. There are numerous little
> errors that would be easily fixed by the community at large, but you
> can't expect someone to ask for access to the repos, sync with the
> right folder and push their changes when all they might want to do is
> correct the grammar of one sentence.
>
> That being said, I never did edit the tazpanel README like I promised.
> I've questioned my lack of motivation for this and I realize I was
> offended when you said you wouldn't let Slitaz be run by "a bunch of
> crazy people on IRC". (And it needs more than just a few corrections.
> I had planned on doing a rewrite, separating basic usage information
> from developer stuff. While I'm not a programmer, not a developer, I
> am a damn good writer.) We crazy people have contributed a lot of
> hours working for the good of the project -- without any real
> direction from the lead developers, only complaints when things don't
> turn out the way you think they should.
>
> With that in mind, consider the analogy of building a house being like
> the production of a linux distro. While the architect may also do
> some of the construction, there is no rationale for criticizing the
> designs of any worker, if there is no blueprint to follow. KISS is
> not good enough direction. And it should be Simple (even for the
> Stupid) to offer what they may, even if it's just language skills and
> a few minor edits.
>
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ikem Krueger
> <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 2011/5/7, Ikem Krueger <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>>> A wiki would be a lot easier
>>
>>> 2011/5/7, Dominique Corbex <dominique.corbex@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> It would be a lot easier for you, but it's a pain for the admins
>>
>> If you want me to help you, make it as easy as possible for me to help you.
>>
>> --
>> LXDE is looking for a new maintainer of LXPanel. So if you are a developer,
>> get in contact with us. :)
>>
>> ---
>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>
>>
>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/