Re: [proaudio] [2626] guitarix2: initial support for python eclass

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


Le Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:51:54 +0200,
Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

The optimize USE will have to wait. I get this with it:

CPU version                              : AMD Phenom(tm) 9600
Quad-Core Processor C++ flags                                :
-march=native -O2 -pipe -ggdb -DNDEBUG -march=k8 -mmmx -m3dnow -msse4a
-mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -ftree-loop-linear -ffinite-math-only
-fno-math-errno -fno-signed-zeros -fstrength-reduce -pipe

march=k8 is not really adapted for my phenom and I don' want to fight
with the wscript for that. I also think a simple march="native" will do
better and safer.

Also, a few seconds later, the build fail at the crybaby.cpp -:::)

Optimization without profiling is not something I would do in a
production box anyway.


> Le Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:21:22 +0200,
> Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> > > No, I mean with a regular build. They come after the system cflags
> > > and will get privileged. According to gentoo policy, the system
> > > cflags must be privileged.
> > I've not seen that policy; can you provide me a link, please?
> 
> It is at least 2 things into the devman:
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_compile/build-environment/index.html
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index.html#not-filtering-variables
> 
> > 
> > Well, -DNDEBUG should definetely be there. I think we should remove
> > the -O3 and -Wall from the build system and let portage do the
> > trick. I would suggest adding a useflag "optimize" and use some of
> > the build systems enforced optimize flags (excluded -march,
> > ofcourse) and disable them otherwise.
> 
> I can add an optimize USE too.
> 
> > 
> > The debug option to waf will trigger -O2 -g -fstack-protector-all in
> > cflags, shouldn't that be stripped so that the build will only
> > contain debug code compiled with the standard cflags? The user can
> > add -ggdb and such in package.env if necessary.
> 
> I agree.
> 
> Dominique
> 
> > 
> > Karl
> > 
> > 2013/3/31 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Le Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:47:31 +0200,
> > > Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > >
> > >> > I guess they are in the output of ./waf .... configure. I can
> > >> > do that.
> > >> Yes, they are.
> > >>
> > >> > I am also thinking to add a custom-cflags USE because guitarix
> > >> > force its own cfags.
> > >> You mean if optimizations are enabled or debug enabled? Couldn't
> > >> we just force disable such things and let the users CFLAGS be
> > >> the one used? Are there some benefits using the enforced ones?
> > >
> > > No, I mean with a regular build. They come after the system cflags
> > > and will get privileged. According to gentoo policy, the system
> > > cflags must be privileged.
> > >
> > > And yes, I will add a debug USE too. And no, I am not sure if they
> > > will be some benefice with them: -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall
> > >
> > > -O3 and -Wall should already be in the system flags if
> > > wanted/needed, but -DNDEBUG should be kept, otherwise we will get
> > > debug code into the build.
> > >
> > > Dominique
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Karl
> > >>
> > >> 2013/3/31 Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >> > Le Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:22:48 +0200,
> > >> > Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > >> >
> > >> >> I mentioned (no heavy report) it earlier today but please
> > >> >> report it upstream.
> > >> >
> > >> > https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/guitarix/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4467
> > >> >
> > >> >> We are also missing some conditional dependencies when
> > >> >> python is enabled. I can add those if you don't want to
> > >> >> investigate it yourself.
> > >> >
> > >> > I guess they are in the output of ./waf .... configure. I can
> > >> > do that.
> > >> >
> > >> > I am also thinking to add a custom-cflags USE because guitarix
> > >> > force its own cfags.
> > >> >
> > >> > Dominique
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Karl
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > "We have the heroes we deserve."
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "We have the heroes we deserve."
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


-- 
"We have the heroes we deserve."



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/