| Re: [proaudio] [2626] guitarix2: initial support for python eclass |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] [2626] guitarix2: initial support for python eclass
- From: Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:54:15 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wisLB6dC4uvKv/ZSAoGUH76nrvr6Pz22YGJMEmRgKBM=; b=CkBXI3drzdLTenbna1eQOE2KnaHgucqG03najoiVJQg2MNMwX5o0Z9jzbu5T0PTAUJ Um0w/ZvA2hmdVomGR3Hmo7L5UCGzjY+AlBZH56beYF9KPnsQiBfinuM9GvQZXSq+MZ3j BVfP+mDxw8J2qGGgy3Ww9K/dz/7c02T4pikII0F5qU48+A9TbGqjo0mmIMO4/KRQdWKV y751qdhz72IejY9081zkg6eTWfya5RxRuxI9kK0SYsLoF2jaxDF/J0KzKNY380JlLrR+ ktKgMOJO25UZ5a71BK6WdAL3pB6MSXjIfpxQacQI27uTFo6ahDhozHw8VEqcmNMPcIhw JFlw==
This does not solve the problem for me. I still get a segfault. And
besides, why not use the new python[-single]-r1 eclass? We are
building a library so it could be good for reverse dependencies (even
though there are none at the moment) to know what python
implementation is used. I don't think that would be overkill, but what
do you think?
Karl
2013/3/31 <subversion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Revision: 2626
> Author: dominique
> Date: 2013-03-31 18:36:31 +0200 (Sun, 31 Mar 2013)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> guitarix2: initial support for python eclass
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
> trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/ChangeLog
> trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/Manifest
> trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/guitarix2-0.25.2.ebuild
> trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/guitarix2-9999.ebuild
>