| Re: [proaudio] [2626] guitarix2: initial support for python eclass |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] [2626] guitarix2: initial support for python eclass
- From: Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:17:16 +0200
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEXy8ubtkoXo7+b1+fbN cGKCeWDtamweFA8eMkmKPkPtvcWRoqyV0Pn7AAACbElEQVQ4jXXTMWvbQBQA4MOlizsdXEXp KAi09mKcLZ0EJxONDRJVkikg9AtqTm63gtHDmVJs1GsnC0JiaTMJGN2f67uzznJb+gZj9PFO 7717IqdtvCAmem4bxMLp/2BEyEBF1+U/0H8uhI6rv+BVLNrY/gH9T0L8yAxk2yMY3YuZxDCn TY/gpBByyTGktIcZOIvFjPNJmqYJDwrx3cIoBrE0zzG4FF8tfBAwM+DonKCYWjgROZ6Upjcm 5Qje58JAmlKKGfIAjzaDUuogZBY2Bjg14eDbywMIqZvwqgqFBcVFB0seYONLb00ZZlh4p0F6 FHNoUMyKAzxowJSQTyj+XloYs3MN3GeMpzyYSTMshLM00ODpWlPp4SDbqs4cViDcGAgmlK/a PsaOg7DvIQ3wzANMqB/iQW/XTkoTLO6XhSeHUoQKe+NLjyY/Ldx7CW2D4WTYhZ3V0GP64RpP Q/E66IUWMLj3+nDn4w2ejMACyXFeHZy6ETcZehc49bv1GQ/0bazNuzm97mDkhnoie9i30WYM w/YCnYT7Fx308s98n0IT//Jod1+aOzdzYXLVbftol+PC+REG3u+0AxdEtuSMB6G+DLGwMH4E vXGmJn8VCLM9LhmrOAMQYt5Wi/DFgIC52iFkUzMpDVmjAaDZRGC+JGwDqzJ/G5fUUcWZAaE7 YfvPLYtIU1Wb4A2IeS7uDMgcIFutiCr766qGfKHyuxvTIERKXVNSN27lDgCuBuojlpxIyJV6 ritS1uWWuHF2Ww7qcIKbqEFVNbmtmm3vGSCHbVXjikrY3SpVxwQWw2aIjwG+ueXTJDmHeK6a HfwGyU5ZSlGeSRQAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
Le Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:54:15 +0200,
Karl Lindén <spray.sucks@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> This does not solve the problem for me. I still get a segfault.
Me too. I have investigated the cflags and -j1, but without success.
I will report it upstream.
All it does for now is to select the correct python version allowing to
install guitarix2 even when python 3 is set. It was the more urgent.
When we finally get guitarix2 to install with this wrapper, we can add
other functions if needed.
> And
> besides, why not use the new python[-single]-r1 eclass? We are
> building a library so it could be good for reverse dependencies (even
> though there are none at the moment) to know what python
> implementation is used. I don't think that would be overkill, but what
> do you think?
I missed it, thanks. I will take a look at it.
Dominique
>
> Karl
>
> 2013/3/31 <subversion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Revision: 2626
> > Author: dominique
> > Date: 2013-03-31 18:36:31 +0200 (Sun, 31 Mar 2013)
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > guitarix2: initial support for python eclass
> >
> > Modified Paths:
> > --------------
> > trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/ChangeLog
> > trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/Manifest
> > trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/guitarix2-0.25.2.ebuild
> > trunk/overlays/proaudio/media-sound/guitarix2/guitarix2-9999.ebuild
> >
>
>
--
"We have the heroes we deserve."