Re: [proaudio] running concurrent versions of ardour (2.x and 3.x)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sa, 13.12.08 00:01 Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 12.12.08 09:49 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Which upstream? Gentoo? Ardour?
>>
>> Ardour.
>>
>> > I would think that maybe the Ardour guys could leave out the locales
>> > during development. I don't want to exclude anyone from helping with
>> > development/debug though.
>>
>> They slotted most .mo files, just not that gtk2_ardour.mo - maybe it's
>> a gtk2 issue? Not sure...
>>
>> > If it's *only* locales maybe we could add a build flag to install or
>> > not install them for 3.0 development work?
>> > Or is it just better to not put it in portage at all, build it by
>> > hand and install it locally instead of globally?
>> >
>> > - Mark
>> >
>>
>> Given that it even doesn't start at all currently, and that the
>> branching and slotting doesn't seem to be finished yet (even
>> the /usr/bin/ardour3 wrapper script still has ardour2 references here
>> and there), I suggest to just wait another week or two :)
>
> Ok, it's slotted now, and both is in /usr
>
> On amd64 I am not able to start ardour3 if jackd runs in realtime,
> timestretch seems broken (maybe due to changing install path for
> librubberband in the SConscript), and I haven't yet found out were .midi
> files go after importing.
>
> Ardour2 is fine.
>
> Cheers.
>
Thanks for the effort!

Cheers,
Mark



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/