Re: [proaudio] running concurrent versions of ardour (2.x and 3.x)

[Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fr, 12.12.08 09:49 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Which upstream? Gentoo? Ardour?

Ardour.
 
> I would think that maybe the Ardour guys could leave out the locales
> during development. I don't want to exclude anyone from helping with
> development/debug though.

They slotted most .mo files, just not that gtk2_ardour.mo - maybe it's
a gtk2 issue? Not sure...

> If it's *only* locales maybe we could add a build flag to install or
> not install them for 3.0 development work?
> Or is it just better to not put it in portage at all, build it by hand
> and install it locally instead of globally?
> 
> - Mark
> 

Given that it even doesn't start at all currently, and that the
branching and slotting doesn't seem to be finished yet (even
the /usr/bin/ardour3 wrapper script still has ardour2 references here
and there), I suggest to just wait another week or two :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature