Re: [proaudio] running concurrent versions of ardour (2.x and 3.x) |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]
On Sa, 13.12.08 00:01 Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fr, 12.12.08 09:49 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Which upstream? Gentoo? Ardour? > > Ardour. > > > I would think that maybe the Ardour guys could leave out the locales > > during development. I don't want to exclude anyone from helping with > > development/debug though. > > They slotted most .mo files, just not that gtk2_ardour.mo - maybe it's > a gtk2 issue? Not sure... > > > If it's *only* locales maybe we could add a build flag to install or > > not install them for 3.0 development work? > > Or is it just better to not put it in portage at all, build it by > > hand and install it locally instead of globally? > > > > - Mark > > > > Given that it even doesn't start at all currently, and that the > branching and slotting doesn't seem to be finished yet (even > the /usr/bin/ardour3 wrapper script still has ardour2 references here > and there), I suggest to just wait another week or two :) Ok, it's slotted now, and both is in /usr On amd64 I am not able to start ardour3 if jackd runs in realtime, timestretch seems broken (maybe due to changing install path for librubberband in the SConscript), and I haven't yet found out were .midi files go after importing. Ardour2 is fine. Cheers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |