Re: [proaudio] running concurrent versions of ardour (2.x and 3.x)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


On Sa, 13.12.08 00:01 Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fr, 12.12.08 09:49 "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Which upstream? Gentoo? Ardour?
> 
> Ardour.
>  
> > I would think that maybe the Ardour guys could leave out the locales
> > during development. I don't want to exclude anyone from helping with
> > development/debug though.
> 
> They slotted most .mo files, just not that gtk2_ardour.mo - maybe it's
> a gtk2 issue? Not sure...
> 
> > If it's *only* locales maybe we could add a build flag to install or
> > not install them for 3.0 development work?
> > Or is it just better to not put it in portage at all, build it by
> > hand and install it locally instead of globally?
> > 
> > - Mark
> > 
> 
> Given that it even doesn't start at all currently, and that the
> branching and slotting doesn't seem to be finished yet (even
> the /usr/bin/ardour3 wrapper script still has ardour2 references here
> and there), I suggest to just wait another week or two :)

Ok, it's slotted now, and both is in /usr

On amd64 I am not able to start ardour3 if jackd runs in realtime,
timestretch seems broken (maybe due to changing install path for
librubberband in the SConscript), and I haven't yet found out were .midi
files go after importing. 

Ardour2 is fine.

Cheers.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/