Re: [proaudio] alsaplayer-9999

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]


Frieder Bürzele wrote:
Dominique Michel wrote:
And it is more about the alsaplayer. I just see at Debian committed new
patches to fix this player:
http://www.frsirt.com/bulletins/7034 http://www.frsirt.com/bulletins/6594 http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2006/msg00272.html

http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer_0.99.76.orig.tar.gz
is exactly the same tarball as the one we use.

http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer_0.99.76-0.3sarge1.diff.gz is a tarball with the fixes. Some are the same, some have changed and some are
new ones.

that is just one big patch or is this the wrong URL

this are the per file splitted patches which are applyable
alsaplayer-0.99.76_input_cdda_cdda_engine.c
alsaplayer-0.99.76_interface_gtk_gtk_interface.cpp
alsaplayer-0.99.76_interface_gtk_PlaylistWindow.cpp
alsaplayer-0.99.76_reader_http_http.c

I'll do a new alsaplayer-0.99.76 ebuild and commit it later that day

I cannot figure out how it is possible to patch all the files with only one
command. What I find is to run

for i in *.diff; do patch -i "$i"; done

in every directory where it is some diff files.

And I am not sure about the diff in input/flac. It look like at they do nothing
during the configure or the compile step.

Dominique

Le Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:03:00 +0200,
Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

I get the cvs version to compile. The problem was the last commit from the
2005-01-30
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=alsaplayer-commits

It is a bug report a few days later:
http://lists.tartarus.org/pipermail/alsaplayer-devel/2005-February/001854.html

and I get exactly the same error.

I don't fix the code in the cvs, but I modify the ebuild to use the 2005-01-29
version of the CVS and to apply the debian patches.
The only new with this version is a "work in progress" gtk2 interface. I don't like it and it have less functionalities as the gtk1 interface, but it did
compile and run.

So if someone will try it, here is the ebuild. It will at least work.

BTW, those debian patches are very good. No one single crash.

Cheers,
Dominique








Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/