Re: [hatari-devel] hatari.app from cirrus-ci (was: Re: One scanline short in ST fullscreen) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] hatari.app from cirrus-ci (was: Re: One scanline short in ST fullscreen)
- From: Anders Eriksson <evldhs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:29:31 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1702934984; x=1703194184; bh=RbmAjx38Zfar1wQBw3GzT2VmmLaZJsnnE2Ou5ss3kOI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=NYlAz1rF9Alr1JNrfoNnPdU2QLH7Qj0YPIKUKQRHoSeE4VzxfFI7VGK8HC8IjZZHv NHhMgwZPtT161V+EJJDSWNMzdbAjbxzxbd496IBDs5N3tGuUO4qUDAGwlQeVWTqSr6 40Uo/iazJ0eapJs8fVcjVy81lSvYVTQ7Q3UVrwXnJdoYRHTpwOm1pP2o5Vm2nQa8SQ P/zc1FDRv/g21kEdYGcWluxH5fsj82F8Nesfdkgq3L7hDHeC5CRMUyX+ttafDf5L1B xwn5ANi1LndGjfTEaoC0NLA807aG9mcuf6naXUDqLC3Lz4WzGk8oYBB6euZ+7QjhNC eNlHncq7YaO3g==
- Feedback-id: 41365795:user:proton
Hello,
I confirm that this build works well with macOS 13.6.1 on a M1 Mini computer.
Video recording with PNG frames works and PASTI disk images as well.
Thanks!
--
Anders Eriksson
ae@xxxxxx
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, 18 December 2023 at 20:38, Bob Carpenter <hatari@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> The latest Hatari artifact worked perfectly for me. It told me that ‘Hatari cannot be opened because the developer cannot be verified”. That is exactly the message I expect to see with a non-paid certificate. Then, I use the right-click menu to open Hatari. At that point, macOS still warns me that the developer cannot be verified but it gives me an option to open Hatari anyway. Then, I can run Hatari successfully. After the first time, I can simply double-click on Hatari to run it.
>
> My point about the embedded executable being in lowercase, if possible, is for the cases when Eero, Nicolas, or yourself suggests a command-line on Atari-Forum to a Mac user. If the Mac user knows how to open the package contents to reach the executable, there could be confusion when the command-line doesn’t work because the executable will be called Hatari instead of hatari. However, this is a minor edge case.
>
> Hopefully, an Intel version (x64) of Hatari can still be compiled before the final release. I am sure there are still many Hatari Mac users who still use Intel Macs. However, that might be a good poll to post on Atari-Forum.. Just like there are no PPC versions of Hatari for the Mac anymore, the support for Intel Macs may stop soon if there is not a way to compile one on cirrus-ci.
>
> Bob C
>
> > On Dec 18, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Thomas Huth th.huth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Am Sun, 17 Dec 2023 11:24:06 -0700
> > schrieb Bob Carpenter bobc@xxxxxxxxxx:
> >
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > As a former Linux user and current macOS terminal user, I completely agree with you. On Linux, the executable should be lowercase. I do not remember if Hatari is capitalized on Windows or not. I do not use Hatari on Windows enough to remember.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, on macOS, the executable inside the Hatari.app bundle (appears as a directory when viewing it on non-macOS systems) should be lowercase. If you run a command from Terminal, we should be able to keep the hatari executable in lowercase and only have Hatari.app with a capital letter.
> >
> > I think the average macOS simply does not care (or even does not know)
> > what's inside of an app bundle as long as it works. But yes, for people who
> > like to compile Hatari for the console, it should be lowercase.
> >
> > I tried to add this logic to the CMakeLists file now, see:
> >
> > https://git.tuxfamily.org/hatari/hatari.git/diff/CMakeLists.txt?id=742a83062e05e9ca38ed15f0fbfcc53fbb44ec85
> >
> > i.e. it's only using "Hatari" for the bundles (or Win32).
> >
> > Let's see how it goes...
> >
> > Thomas
>
>
>