Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: "hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
From: Toni Wilen <twilen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:31:36 +0000
Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=winuae.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=winuae.net; dkim=pass header.d=winuae.net; arc=none
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=qdc3qP41bBikTKsMfZZHSfW+gGr0lOD9etvpt0nxW0I=; b=EwKNUYXTOmP7FLe/dz/TtcYItprOAASEZhFuosl1SJxPbqYP/BQGBmvfyUjfjUYhV/sXKjuyDVN0gxWOQq/DdZqbexv66T/8BpxZKFTxNp+NS5C3BNqOtKoL2FIEqwlioeVpllPoRbKhaghf94bTjnBVbbDP8qlwDO/P9FId6egFkHGDxGnIHIsk5RHOxFTfK/8T4Ez1YijlTDY00k8oQa/9DRft76vNhCe6QOYqfLRZOOflqCTr/0rMCy7EuOgxVYre0+HOseotEXSFUn8JwM+OKuPDa42ABfSv+Kt8o5K6egUIGAgEKu7dlR2L5FH5Gx5AOmJ4Mx8tVKthDLnDSg==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gxq51UhrEUlO84qSyjV3V74Y9DxNZxkFKKdliLo7Pr1U5XIzqGt10HidX2PWYl4DpIXcw5mpYyIIXDS6TakWGk1Kpg5j8++tTlKZctWjDHKYsUK30R/4Cu1OyOQMZWlkdITD9DMmy9IDcy43vDPmAlZLgvVbbEMCSZ+ZqFLoqWPtKIJ9DxLZIjDxq8hYvvG15DLAJ3/9IJnCpLgOe9rAiwKnzdnCPocZK3xnFG0jx+g2wHSmvBygzt/oTBz9ftcjWxQgqWkgXKjbMuiymMLrGz87kDwvkNHQ33bc+ROQ0yqGlJLxrbIhPD7a8m4tKTDfvUCO04i02hstVvFZSfe6zA==
Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=winuae.net;
Msip_labels:
Thread-index: AQHZ51Rfop6NopJyMUuGbfASyRtLNLAbfzsAgAMmK4CAACEiAIAACJqAgAACE4CAAW3+gIAAAv2AgAAIaACAAAE2AIAAj0bM
Thread-topic: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem

>I guess it's easier for Toni to have a smaller code patch in gencpu.c

>(which is already quite hard to read/follow and have all the important
>CPU logic) and leave it to the compiler to optimize cpuemu_xx.c files
>(which are generated files that not many people will read, except on
>specific opcodes' debugging)

That. Gencpu generated code has always been designed to generate ugly code that requires optimizing compiler and it is not meant for human eyes. (except when debugging...)

There are lots of similar cases in generated files. Better have ugly code in generated code than make gencpu even more complex.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
  - From: Andreas Grabher

References:
- Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède
- Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
  - From: Andreas Grabher
- Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
Next by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem
Next by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] 68030 and movem

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/