Re: [hatari-devel] Resizable.

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 26/06/2017 à 21:10, Jerome Vernet a écrit :
> Le 25/06/2017 à 19:56, Nicolas Pomarède a écrit :
> > Le 22/06/2017 à 21:08, Cocoa Pod a écrit :
> > > bonsoir,
> > >
> > > > For information, I'm adding a "Resizable" button in SDL2 options in
> > > > xib (french & english) and associated code.
> > > > A+
> > > > Miguel
> > >
> > > This is done and runs. But I've questions before send diff file.
> > > -Is it possible to compile Hatari2 for SDL1.2x ?
> > > -if yes what I have to do with these three buttons for sdl2 options ?
> >
> > Yes, it's possible to compile hatari with sdl1, but for OSX it seems
> > the general opinion is that SDL1 is not performing correctly
> > performance-wise under OSX.
> It still work pretty well under 10.5/PPC, not x86. My latest build for
> PPC is really usable, using an old version of SDL1.2
> But SDL1.2 x86 have performance issues.
>
> BUT MacOs GUI cannot be build now under 10.5, too much deprecated
> function have benn replaced, so, no MacOsX GUI for SDL1.2/PPC. So You
> can forget SDL1 for MacOsX build.
>
> Long time aggo, I added conditional build code for SDL1/SDL2, making
> specifing SDL2 option hidden for SDL1. Do not know if it's still here.
> The same was done for new/old core.
>
> I think that now only SDL2/New Core have any interest ?

Hi

if people want to use recent Hatari under older OSX or older CPU, I 
think they can still use the default Hatari's UI and choose to use SDL1 
or SDL2.

But for more moder OSX release, maintaining the mac OSX specific UI only 
for SDL2 should be enough for the majority (unless someone really wants 
to spend time on supporting SDL1 for OSX UI, but I'm not sure it would 
be really useful)


Nicolas