Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:28:08 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YRnH7Hga01nlcNE9/pxfitJ8MJUA1i3DrTz2/DtwoSk=; b=ijtEG4AK6Z9qJ/dwKYCzta1VWW9Q7EW6VJvreL5Vusu/a3rdYhhvhwzNZ4fJ2TLHyv iRLiXd8ebzIAxa8/Acycx4sebXJCqmJx4+3Ovn37fAGBrumNWwScgt4ae7oGsZTZtXoI NxCqci2b2dxUEJ8N8DgEJyhRV54gTb79RpCwxGvfuQL+wjD9bhUa183Be/LAvjSQOA3Z AYn6xSNPjnjKYwPuXrxUv86Jr+paa9B/3HLbAFN6M8xKpVbEANOSHhn3lmK9LmhidE5k v4CWxExNWwYChH2GKZ263qLlmcLLuYTleTFHGWphQADbTGDclkAAoFmNsktm687g08Rh brOA==

Hi,

One more suggestion: Is it possible to also include FPSR register
contents in test program's result check parameters? Clear it before each
test instruction, execute test instruction, store FPSR/compare FPSR
against real hardware stored FPSR.

Exceptions are not needed, if FPSR exception bits match, exception
should also work correctly. (Arithmetic exceptions are not yet enabled
in emulation).

A fair point. A new version will be along soon :)

References:
- Re: [hatari-devel] Re: FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Andreas Grabher
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Douglas Little
- Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
  - From: Toni Wilen

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
Next by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update
Next by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] FPU update

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/