|Re: [hatari-devel] Re: FPU update|
[ Thread Index |
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Re: FPU update
- From: Douglas Little <doug694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:42:50 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=O7ws6Mx/Gu84pdui3/67IWRMXeJu0Y1PIPBhxLiAD5U=; b=Tyx/czeq7alXXbfgT/sv+K5SmLWnMmAlrfuwaUZnC0Ay3PUe3/DikkKNLhHWTsI3vE RzV/cKd4UnFE3ww4CwMqUwyyOaTvPPH4xvPAxaeBp0fzERdmjARhOEbpAtcxZwIr+BkH uhDxDY5Rrpqk2tsPWXiPYMliZeF4AjaTHyr1P0LkxTge78fTWsCjb1G8HJQkDwz5PlgV d5Gst9FSF28rnomPraVEa8XVWGS8thvARpZOmAX9RFPy2iSuHMXylYGf8K5uLf0TLjeO ByIMJF1EB0Bw1DIId5mB4y0Vxtu8txLsFKrvtoQJqDe1MtE5eadiZDDa45qK+YWHfvd9 r//A==
I have quite a lot of float based 68k code (asm and C), some of which is quite sensitive to rounding and other fun things - varied implementations of floor() and integer conversion, some handwritten pow() operations etc. If/when this makes it into a version of Hatari I can compile I can do some tests with it.
I also created a simple 6888x conformance/correctness test recently, which was probably posted here a while back. Might be interesting to run the softfloat impl. against that sometime.