Re: [hatari-devel] Next Hatari release for OSX

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 22/05/2015 15:20, Cocoa Pod a écrit :
> /Users/msaro/Desktop/Hatari-ObjC/hatari/src/cpu/fpp.c:154:9: warning:
> 'FP_SNAN' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
> #define FP_SNAN  (1 << 14)
>          ^
> /usr/include/math.h:700:9: note: previous definition is here
> #define FP_SNAN         FP_NAN
>          ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> [ 46%] Building C object src/cpu/CMakeFiles/UaeCpu.dir/newcpu.c.o
> /Users/msaro/Desktop/Hatari-ObjC/hatari/src/cpu/newcpu.c:5468:4:
> warning: implicit declaration of function 'mmu_do_hit' is invalid in C99
>        [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>                          mmu_do_hit ();
>                          ^
> /Users/msaro/Desktop/Hatari-ObjC/hatari/src/cpu/newcpu.c:6468:68:
> warning: for loop has empty body [-Wempty-body]
>                  for (lookup2 = lookuptab; lookup2->mnemo != dp->mnemo;
> lookup2++);
>
>            ^
> /Users/msaro/Desktop/Hatari-ObjC/hatari/src/cpu/newcpu.c:6468:68: note:
> put the semicolon on a separate line to silence this warning

Hi

those 3 warnings seem ok to me. 1st one is about a conflicting name 
between fp_snan and osx' math.h. But as FP_SNAN is not used anymay in 
fpp.c, that's not a problem.

The 2 others are more about proper declaration / formatting, but here 
also it's harmless, it depends on the C compiler and its level of warning.

Nicolas