| Re: [hatari-devel] fopen traces |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
Hi,
On sunnuntai 05 huhtikuu 2015, Thomas Huth wrote:
> schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On tiistai 31 maaliskuu 2015, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > But IMHO it would be nice to have this somewhat more closely
> > > related to the other "gemdos" trace flag. I.e. when you run
> > > "--trace help", it should show up next to the "gemdos" flag
> > > instead. And maybe rename it to "gemdos_fopen" ?
> >
> > What if it would be named just "files"?
Reason for this is that if it's a commmonly used option,
short name is better than excessively long one...
> I think it should at least have the "gemdos_" prefix to make it clear
> that it belongs to the gemdos hd emulation. (If you just name it
> "files" or "fopen", how is the user supposed to know that this is about
> gemdos hd emulation and not ACSI, IDE, SCSI
It's NOT about GEMDOS HD emulation. Hatari supports
tracing GEMDOS calls without GEMDOS HD emulation being
enabled. I just commited support for that also for
GEMDOS fopen tracing.
> or even Hatari native fopen calls?
All other trace options are for tracing what emulated code does,
so I don't think this should be a problem.
- Eero