| Re: [hatari-devel] HDDriver issues with WinUAE CPU core (and with EmuTOS) -> RAM detection issue |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] HDDriver issues with WinUAE CPU core (and with EmuTOS) -> RAM detection issue
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:29:25 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1420972166; l=1113; s=domk; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=Pi5bmreD8XN0wmyZrVUhAoio38Y=; b=Er3N0dsdreBIlQaf3IpqYpoolgmfaJLVDsz4af1e39zkx+e/P7yrrtk3uWgpuRwl6c4 MRXieloVXLGS8LQOHlTj3MU+I5ubhwyjkCzL/gK5JmoXrsO7YxowVNaVRMafcMgyrj1yL D+DiW1kUe/ZqTkTiZ5+N8yBCqK0kUlvbpLI=
Hi,
> > Well, I don't have a problem with EmuTOS not supporting 32 bit mode.
> > What I just wanted to check whether there are any problems with EmuTOS
> > and HDDRIVER, as listed in the Hatari manual, but I could not find any.
> > 24 bit mode so far was fine for verifying this.
>
> Snapshots are pre-build, so you just need to download the 512k binary
> (for TT/Falcon) from here:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/emutos/files/snapshots/
>
> In my experience, they work better than latest release
> (faster, more fixes or features etc), release is better
> only if you want complete translation to your own language. :-)
Maybe we misunderstand ;-). I just wanted to check whether there are any
problems with HDDRIVER and EmuTOS, because the Hatari manual says there
are. But I did not find any with EmuTOS 0.9.3. The fact that EmuTOS
0.9.3 does not work with 32 bit addressing is not relevant for me.
I just wonder what the problems mentioned in the Hatari manual are
supposed to be. If there are none anybody can reproduce the manual
should probably be updated ...
Take care
Uwe