| Re: [hatari-devel] Larger mono resolution (was: reverting Max window size setting to Hatari v1.4 size?) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Larger mono resolution (was: reverting Max window size setting to Hatari v1.4 size?)
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:08:06 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1327561706; l=1118; s=domk; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=Zndqv2WRTPIQVdGOSMdsvMR1vx8=; b=xGIkNuEMNwb+hrAnSQbi5e0GZpKcRkpTzyMhIGgrVCFWDc3MblM6Ex61LXd/51jFirN 3ZH0J5En94FU5GPDP4PPd2tvA3Q1nKqGYpLyhbkiq4MeAWlycQSP/+8DDf1cpgARrGZoh xDvCOoWITEpdDUTWZl3xaWDrwCQV+aRbfSE=
Hi,
> What max resolution you would prefer and what programs you would use with
> this huge resolution?
1600x1200 and 1920x1200 would be fine. I would use Thing, different
editors (Pure C, Edison) and other with it. Actually any GEM program profits
from a bigger screen.
> Max resolution affects Hatari memory usage, so I'd rather have some
> useful/reasonable limit for it.
In monochrome
> Have you tested yet that TOS v3 and the apps actually work with it? :-)
Yes, I did some time ago.
> For example Calamus 1.09 SL (1987) isn't stable with larger resolutions.
> I think I also had problems 1991 demo of Calamus SE, whereas a demo of
> 2006 Atari version of Calamus doesn't work with only 14MB of RAM Hatari
> supports.
That's a problem of Calamus, but most GEM applications are
resolution-independent. Those that are not are buggy.
> > My guess is there are problems with the PMMU.
>
> Does't some MagiC version work also on 68000 machines? If yes,
> Does that version work with Hatari?
The last time I tried it did not work. I will try again soon.
Best regards
Uwe