Re: [eigen] [Review] Pull request 66, Huge Tensor module improvements

[Christian Seiler <christian@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Christoph,

> And another question I could not extract from the discussion so far:
> Do you intend to support Tensors where the number of dimensions is
> not fixed at compile-time?
> Using ArrayXi-based indexing it would not be too hard to implement
> and it might have some (very) rare use-cases (e.g., n'th derivations
> of m-variable, single-value functions are m^n-tensors).

I have not exactly planned it, but I don't think it's going to be
terribly difficult to do once the interface is stable. It's definitely
NOT on the top of my TODO list...

Regards,
Christian