Re: [eigen] alignment bug - or where is our non sse inversion gone?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More Archives ]

actually this piece of code was really bugged: B =
A.transpose().inverse() was wrong too.

both problems solved.


On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Hauke Heibel
<hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, I see what you mean. I mixed up the architecture (SSE vs. General)
> and the alignment flag for this case. I would have fixed it in a "bad"
> way by completely going for the non-vectorized version when the data
> were not aligned.
> Anyways, you know what you are doing and thank you for taking care!
> - Hauke
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Gael Guennebaud
> <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> hm sorry but I don't see it. Here is what I have for ei_compute_inverse_size4:
>> template<int Arch, typename Scalar, typename MatrixType, typename ResultType>
>> struct ei_compute_inverse_size4;
>> Anyway, actually I'm doing a different fix which consist in doing
>> unaligned loads/stores if the input and/or output do not have the
>> AlignedBit flags. Here doing unaligned accesses is fine.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+