> Ok, I see what you mean. I mixed up the architecture (SSE vs. General)
> and the alignment flag for this case. I would have fixed it in a "bad"
> way by completely going for the non-vectorized version when the data
> were not aligned.
>
> Anyways, you know what you are doing and thank you for taking care!
>
> - Hauke
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Gael Guennebaud
> <
gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> hm sorry but I don't see it. Here is what I have for ei_compute_inverse_size4:
>>
>> template<int Arch, typename Scalar, typename MatrixType, typename ResultType>
>> struct ei_compute_inverse_size4;
>>
>> Anyway, actually I'm doing a different fix which consist in doing
>> unaligned loads/stores if the input and/or output do not have the
>> AlignedBit flags. Here doing unaligned accesses is fine.
>
>
>