[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] nesting
- From: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:38:18 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZEIQ9Mj2G5A7Hf9lO6AB+tWY6S6E+i/F1aPAjvXNl2c=; b=Aw4k+hv8/DZoibCGH0EQqrtnFreespugnerIioLY3xGYVz7Arlk0hbuWy1ZEAwqfy2 gL6zbQUc+EZ2r9zdNPMcuRln7vEacT+Ud38pOGnBV8ykvHEuvd7T/hYl7/CIvjvgbJp6 6FN3+AEhtijU5cjsa9Bu9mVFmTIUq+HjqvlRs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=seCw94TTpEfuN54v7M0takZ1ilFzcZAKRA7iO5tAjtIwyfo+UGtwf7dqgqIr5WTPym pPtQV/HDbsJFl6HO4dDvNdsRa5SKLAsQ4Kn7Cl+NGIWCL5DnZcIpd7CVmXMxvoxv2i8W Y74GkH4fDOcoF5/LmkaqJp+uZDGK9HGaBQypY=
It should have been "toggle only the storage order."
Since we now have bit which are not inherited, we might rename
HereditaryBits bits and introduce a new set. How about
DominantBits /* always inherited */
RecessiveBits /* only in rare cases inherited */
Then, in the future one could do
Flags = OtherType::Flags & ~RecessiveBits
to disable only those we don't want to inherit. This will of course
only then make sense, when there is the possibility for new recessive
bits in the future or just because we like it...
- Hauke