[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Testing 2.0
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:14:35 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAV16SSB0Bf/DzCE52gPllLWS0fuIOgStKbTou+k1lM=; b=HN4UrCCNC/o9P0orWfd+6YASjfoO6wU1FrRfjEDyNJGbwc6e36PBLKu2/6txam/O1h kmuGcOWHryTlgD1RzjwW6/+8d4yfnF251oRAJH3/fm4se3cmRGQ3B7iu3pSRHjEWMI7/ FOHzGJJmIdyt9ArthVCNT0VOEbUdrSLUdnFjY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fSY/WiA7FaTPQOh1vC26aWnBEyzpudlXUJ2yiwR5lpH91dCK9nmmnL3lhyDiTojoKP 9DaCXhU/D5nIiRTuA0VUh4gAzeCpJ0a/nvQLpqoRI/upzYd2BaxFPUjo28aNFjMZbJXC oBb0AUai2Xo079Wz5pfkJetqtVdWfJowdU+mI=
It's quite worth testing the current branch (or at least 2.0.11), a
ton of fixes have gone in since 2.0.0.
Benoit
2010/2/11 Robert Lupton the Good <rhl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I haven't tried eigen 2.0.12 with intel, but 2.0.0 generates quite a few errors with -Wall.
>
> I'd be happy to come up with a patch that fixes the ones that my code sees if it'll make it into the distrib (even 2.0.13)
>
> R
>
>
>
>