Re: [eigen] Map: introduce "AlignedPointer" flag?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]


2009/10/21 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
> If I understand this correctly, this is about making fixed size
> objects vectorizable with Map's? If not, then it is on my wishlist.

Yes it is :)

Benoit

>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This is for Gael. Currently in Map, what's the precise meaning of
>> "ForceAligned" ? Is it:
>>
>>  " If you use packet access, then use aligned packet access " ?
>>
>> If yes, is it correct to say that at the moment we don't offer any way
>> to tell that the pointer passed to Map is aligned, and that therefore
>> we may enable packet access also e.g. for good fixed sizes? I remember
>> you saying something like "we need a FirstAligned flag", were you
>> talking about that? What do you think about calling that
>> AlignedPointer and renaming ForceAligned to ForceAlignedAccess ?
>> Finally, can you remind me what the use case for ForceAligned is, if
>> we have AlignedPointer?
>>
>> If you tell me all that I can try to get that done ;)
>>
>> Benoit
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rohit Garg
>
> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>
> Senior Undergraduate
> Department of Physics
> Indian Institute of Technology
> Bombay
>
>
>



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/